What Actually Happened Though? - Mutiny! On The Junior

A mutiny is a strange concept: a small-scale coup, often necessarily violent, but on the authoritative power structure that is a ship, there is often no other way to more formally oppose the captain. On a whaling ship like the Junior, the typical power structure would be a captain at the top with complete authority and power - a dictator - followed by a first mate (second in charge), then a second mate, and often a third mate. In the event of any of their deaths, next on the chain of command would take over. The Captain and Mates were appointed before the ship set sail, often by the owner or benefactor of the ship. Completely overthrowing the captain and his mates was often the only possible way to change leadership on a long voyage. 

Mutiny has long been thought by historians and scholars to be an anomaly, a rare occurrence that was the exception to the norm. Niklas Frykman, eminent scholar on mutiny, argues that due to the unreliability of the data on mutinies, it is hard to say exactly how common they are. One thing that is certain, based on Frykman’s research, is that mutiny was likely more common than was originally thought. Mutiny in the age of sail looks bad for all parties: both the mutineers and captains, and thus was likely underreported. The mutineers committed a crime, and thus faced criminal prosecution or social ostracization, while the captains could face a career-ending stigma from others in the shipping business. 

The mutiny on the Junior was not one that went unreported. Perhaps due to the violent nature, or the lack of a clear motive, the Junior mutiny riveted the New Bedford public for the better part of a year. Though not well known today, the newspapers at the time followed every twist and turn, from the event itself to the outcome of the trials a year later. 

But what happened on the Junior? What happened!? Why summarize when you can hear directly from the source! The following are clippings from an unnamed New Bedford newspaper describing the original story, and updates as the story unfolded.

First Newspaper Account of Violent Mutiny

First Newspaper Account of Violent Mutiny

Dated April 2nd 1858, this excerpt is a description of the graphic mutiny, copied from the Sydney Empire, in which it was first reported January 12th 1858. Warning to the reader - this excerpt is graphic and detailed in describing violence.

Mutineers Entry to the Ships Log

Mutineers Entry to the Ships Log

This excerpt is a copy of the entry into the ship’s log by the mutineers, signed by them. Dated April 23 1858. 
Notice the mutineers simply explain what they did in less graphic detail than the newspaper, but fail to mention their intentions. 

Description of the Conditions of the Makeshift Prison

Description of the Conditions of the Makeshift Prison

This excerpt is the description of the conditions of the makeshift prison aboard the Junior for the 8 mutineers captured by Australian police. This excerpt also shows how different newspaper clippings were dated by hand with black pen in the scrapbook. Dated August 6 1858.

The Aftermath of the Junior Returning to New Bedford

The Aftermath of the Junior Returning to New Bedford

These clippings, from August 27 - September 3 1858 detail the aftermath of the Junior returning to New Bedford with the mutineers locked up in the makeshift prison. They show the public interest in the event, claiming thousands of people went in person to see the ship.

The Verdict in the Trial of the Mutineers

The Verdict in the Trial of the Mutineers

With a large number of pages devoted to over-specific details on the trial of the mutineers, this excerpt is a jump forward, both through the scrapbook and through time, to look at the verdict of the trial. Dated Dec 1st 1858. Note that Mr. Butler is the attorney of Cyrus Plummer, who was the leader of the mutiny. 

Prev Next